Involved in the production, selling and
purchasing of child porn, which means the planned and executed sexual
abuse of children were:
Doctors, lawyers, cops, priests and
teachers...”authority figures” whom children and many others are
not “allowed” to question challenge for their behaviour or blame.
I am sure many of them are smiling,
soft spoken, polite pillars, polite of the community whose friends
and neighbours are, or will be, just shocked. And it appears that it
is Canadians pillars leading the abuse.
Do you suppose that many of these
people are actually parents themselves?
Here is the link- Don't forget to drop your jaws
I want you to think about something
else alongside this case. Had the police not interrupted this and
managed to rescue these children, and many children all over the
world do NOT get rescued, I think it likely that many of these
victims, who did not commit suicide, would very likely have ended up
in the mental illness system, not believed about what they had been
put through, and many of them would have received a nice psychiatric
containment label, invalidating them for their “attention seeking
stories” since no one believes that the pillars of the community,
or anyone’s parents, would ever harm children. Yet this is reality
isn't it? The FIRST thing the scum of the earth do, including the
scum in the expensive suits, is REDUCE the targets of their abuse to
the level of item, object, or commodity, since doing so makes the
abuse, or use, of them acceptable to the scum of the earth.
The labels reducing the patient to a self contained “disease” process do not solve real life problems with real people in the real world. In fact, they often re-traumatize the victims of abuse all over again and keep them trapped in a position of permanent invalidation and often increased abuse BECAUSE of the reductionism.
The labels reducing the patient to a self contained “disease” process do not solve real life problems with real people in the real world. In fact, they often re-traumatize the victims of abuse all over again and keep them trapped in a position of permanent invalidation and often increased abuse BECAUSE of the reductionism.
Breaking Bad
How do you think I mean that?
Do I mean that someone who breaks away
from the norm is breaking bad, OR
Do I mean that we human beings who want to live a decent life and make it possible for others to do the same need to break BAD; bad itself. All things mean what they mean in context. If you believe that you can identify ANY subset of humanity as the good group or the bad group based on concrete details like job title, for example, you are delusional yourself.
Do I mean that we human beings who want to live a decent life and make it possible for others to do the same need to break BAD; bad itself. All things mean what they mean in context. If you believe that you can identify ANY subset of humanity as the good group or the bad group based on concrete details like job title, for example, you are delusional yourself.
Do you really want to break the power
of aggressors operating with hidden agendas of domination and
control? If you do, talk CONSTANTLY about the hidden agendas of power
and control and the people using them and do it with the SAME
attitude of observation and clinical detachment which you currently
use in observing and assessing the victims who complain about them.
Believe me...if you invalidate the crap
out of them, while observing and assessing THEM like objects of
observation, often enough, for long enough, they will give up their
“game.”
In other words, use your metaphysical
power in a way, on whom, and where it will do some genuine good,
which is not about suppressing the feelings of the victims of abuse
nor making abusers FEEL better about it when, or IF they get caught.
No comments:
Post a Comment